172RGCutlass RG
cessnaEffective Sep 28, 2026Timetable 1995–2024
What mechanics have reported to the FAA on the Cessna 172RG Cutlass RG, the airworthiness directives in force, and the NTSB accident record, on one sheet. The retractable-gear 172RG, built 1980–85.
Top six of ten systems. Counts reflect who reports, not how reliable the airplane is.
- Registered
- 444 in the U.S., FAA registry Sep 28, 2026
- Reports on file
- 392 since 1995
- 2016–2025
- 11, about 2.5 a year per 1,000 registered
- ADs in force
- 17 (6 airframe, 11 engine)
- Accidents
- 126 since 1995, 13 fatal
Airworthiness directives
17 in force · 2 superseded not shown
From Federal Register final rules since 1995. Whether an AD applies to a particular airplane depends on its serial number, engine and installed equipment; confirm against the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System.
AD2020-18-01Effective Nov 12, 2020Textron Aviation Inc. AirplanesRepetitive
Cracks have been found in the lower area of the forward cabin doorpost bulkhead on certain Textron Aviation airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the lower cabin doorposts at the strut attach fitting for cracks and repair of any cracks found.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2020-16-08Effective Aug 17, 2020Aspen Avionics, Inc.One-time
Aspen EFD1000 flight display systems with software version 2.10 or 2.10.1 and no independent backup instruments may lose attitude, altitude, and airspeed information. This AD requires installing a software update to address the display failure condition.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2001-23-03Effective Dec 27, 2001Cessna Aircraft Company Models 172N, 172P, R172K, 172RG, F172N, F172P, FR172J, and FR172K AirplanesRepetitive
Electrical shorts between the map light switch and fuel line in the left forward door post can cause fuel leaks and in-flight fires. Inspect for chafing, repair any damage, provide clearance between components, and install a switch cover insulator; repeat inspections and replacement as needed.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2001-06-06Effective May 14, 2001Cessna Aircraft Company Model 172RG AirplanesRepetitive
Certain Cessna 172RG aircraft have cracked main landing gear pivot assemblies that could result in gear-up landings or loss of braking. This AD requires inspection of the main landing gear pivot assemblies for cracks, replacement of any cracked assemblies, and installation of new bushings on the pivot assembly shaft.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2000-06-01Effective May 5, 2000Cessna Aircraft Company 150, 152, 172, 177, 180, 182, 185, 188, 206, 207, 210, and 337 Series AirplanesOne-time
Fuel strainer assemblies on these airplanes were found to have fuel standpipes incorrectly installed, which could allow foreign material to enter the fuel system and engine. The AD requires measuring the standpipe length and replacing any fuel strainer assembly that does not meet the correct specification.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD97-01-13Effective Feb 3, 1997Cessna Aircraft Company 100, 200, 300, and 400 Series AirplanesOne-time
Certain Cessna fuel, oil, and hydraulic hoses with part number S51-10 installed between March 1995 and February 3, 1997 may have defective reinforcement wrapping that can cause hose collapse and system failure. This AD requires checking maintenance records for these hoses, inspecting them for diagonal or spiral external reinforcement, and immediately replacing any nonconforming hoses with ones having criss-cross reinforcement.
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2026-04-11Effective Apr 8, 2026Lycoming EnginesRepetitive
Certain connecting rod assemblies and bushings installed in Lycoming engines may fail due to inadequate design, potentially causing engine failure. This AD requires repetitive oil inspections for bronze particulates and replacement of affected connecting rod bushings with eligible parts.
Engine models named O-360 series
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2022-16-03Effective Aug 15, 2022Continental Aerospace Technologies, Inc., Lycoming Engines, and Textron Lycoming/Subsidiary of Textron, Inc. Reciprocating EnginesOne-time
Improperly lubricated roller bearings in certain S-1200 series magnetos may cause overheating and magneto seizure. This AD requires replacement of affected magnetos or inspection and component replacement if no white grease is detected.
Engine models named O-360
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2020-25-12Effective Jan 15, 2021Superior Air Parts, Inc. Engines and Lycoming Engines Reciprocating Engines With a Certain SAP Crankshaft AssemblyOne-time
Three crankshaft assembly failures resulted in loss of engine power and emergency landings. This AD requires immediate removal from service of all affected SAP crankshaft assemblies.
Engine models named O-360, O-360-A1A, O-360-A1C, O-360-A1D, O-360-A2A, O-360-A2D, O-360-A2E, O-360-A2F, O-360-A2G, O-360-B2A, O-360-C1A, O-360-C1C
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2009-22-03Effective Nov 12, 2009Hartzell Propeller Inc. ()HC-()2Y(K,R)-() Series PropellersRepetitive
Hartzell propeller hubs may crack, causing blade separation and loss of aircraft control. The AD requires initial and repetitive eddy current inspections of the front cylinder half for cracks, removal of cracked hubs from service, or installation of improved design hub (suffix SN A or B) as terminating action.
Engine models named O-360 series
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2006-06-16Effective Apr 27, 2006Lycoming Engines (Formerly Textron Lycoming) AEIO-360, IO-360, O-360, LIO-360, and LO-360 Series Reciprocating EnginesOne-time
Certain crankshafts in Lycoming AEIO-360, IO-360, O-360, LIO-360, and LO-360 series engines can fail, causing total engine power loss and possible aircraft loss. This AD requires replacement of affected crankshafts.
Engine models named O-360
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterShow 6 older
AD2005-19-11Effective Oct 21, 2005Lycoming Engines (Formerly Textron Lycoming) AEIO-360, IO-360, O-360, LIO-360, LO-360, AEIO-540, IO-540, O-540, and TIO-540 Series Reciprocating EnginesOne-time
Certain Lycoming 360 and 540 series engines have experienced crankshaft failures that could cause total engine power loss and in-flight engine failure. This AD requires replacement of affected crankshafts.
Engine models named O-360
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2004-10-14Effective Jun 25, 2004Lycoming Engines (Formerly Textron Lycoming), Direct-Drive Reciprocating EnginesRepetitive
Crankshaft gear retaining bolts may loosen or fail on certain Lycoming direct-drive reciprocating engines, potentially causing sudden engine failure. The AD requires removal of existing gear retaining bolts and lockplates from service, installation of new hardware, and inspection of crankshaft gear installation after propeller strikes, sudden stoppages, or overhaul.
Engine models named O-360 series
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2002-12-07Effective Jul 3, 2002Textron Lycoming Reciprocating EnginesEmergency AD
Oil can leak between the converter plate and accessory housing on certain Lycoming engines, potentially causing complete engine oil loss, engine seizure, and fire. This AD requires replacement of the oil filter converter plate gasket or kit, inspection of the oil filter base for leakage, and eventually installation of an improved gasket or kit to eliminate the need for repetitive replacements.
Engine models named O-360-A1AD, O-360-A1F6D, O-360-A1G6D, O-360-A1LD, O-360-A3AD, O-360-A4AD, O-360-A5AD, O-360-E1A6D
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD2000-04-10Effective Mar 9, 2000Hoffmann Propeller Co. HO27( ) and HO4/27 Series PropellersRepetitive
Propeller mounting bolts may lose torque due to operating conditions and environmental factors, risking propeller separation. The AD requires installing improved mounting bolts, torquing them to a higher value, flying the airplane once, and retorquing as needed.
Engine models named O-360 series
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD97-15-11Effective Aug 12, 1997Avco Lycoming and Textron Lycoming Reciprocating EnginesOne-time
Certain Lycoming reciprocal engines may have defective piston pins that could fail and cause engine failure. Affected engines must be removed from service and replaced with serviceable parts according to the referenced service bulletin.
Engine models named O-360
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterAD95-07-01Effective Apr 12, 1995Textron Lycoming O-360, LO-360, HO-360, HIO-360, TIO-360, LIO-360, AEIO-360, O-540, IO-540, TIO-540, LTIO-540, IVO-540, AEIO-540, TIO-541, and IO-720 Series Reciprocating EnginesOne-time
Unapproved connecting rod bolts sourced from Superior Air Parts, Inc., have failed in certain Textron Lycoming engines, potentially causing engine failure. The AD requires removing all suspect connecting rod bolts prior to further flight and replacing them with serviceable bolts.
Engine models named O-360-A1A, O-360-A1AD, O-360-A1C, O-360-A1D, O-360-A1F6, O-360-A1F6D, O-360-A1G6, O-360-A1G6D, O-360-A1LD, O-360-A2A, O-360-A2D, O-360-A2E
Read the AD in the Federal RegisterEngine ADs name an engine model family used on some Cutlass RGs; check the exact model and serial. 4 more apply by part number only and are not listed.
Accident history
126 U.S. accidents involving the Cutlass RG since 1995, 13 of them fatal, with 26 fatalities. Homebuilt aircraft excluded. Counts, not rates: they follow fleet size, hours flown and how the airplane is used.
- Ground30
- Takeoff and climb225
- Cruise215
- Maneuvering143
- Approach and descent180
- Landing470
- Other or unknown10
Phase of the event the NTSB recorded as defining the accident.
- 1995–1999386
- 2000–2004303
- 2005–2009273
- 2010–2014131
- 2015–2019100
- 2020–202460
- 2025–202620
2026 is year to date. Investigations can take a year or more to reach the data.
NTSB cause findings, 2008–2026 · share of 45 accidents with findings
- 51% Personnel issues
- 49% Aircraft systems, powerplant and structure
- 16% Aircraft performance and control
- 8.9% Not determined
- 4.4% Environmental issues
Most frequent cause findings
- Forgotten action/omissionPersonnel issues6
- Incorrect action performancePersonnel issues5
- Gear extension and retract sys: not used/operatedAircraft systems, powerplant and structure4
- Aircraft controlPersonnel issues4
- Use of checklistPersonnel issues3
- Main landing gear: failureAircraft systems, powerplant and structure2
- Gear extension and retract sys: failureAircraft systems, powerplant and structure2
- Directional control: not attained/maintainedAircraft performance and control2
- Decision making/judgmentPersonnel issues2
- Hydraulic fluid: fluid levelAircraft systems, powerplant and structure2
Findings about systems and powerplant
- Gear extension and retract sys: not used/operatedLanding gear system4
- Main landing gear: failureLanding gear system2
- Gear extension and retract sys: failureLanding gear system2
- Hydraulic fluid: fluid levelFluids2
- Recip eng oil sys: not specifiedEngine (reciprocating)2
- Oil: fluid levelFluids1
- Nose/tail landing gear: malfunctionLanding gear system1
- Landing gear actuator: capability exceededLanding gear system1
Wording is the NTSB’s. An accident can carry findings in several categories. Read individual investigations in the NTSB’s CAROL database.
What gets written up
392 reports · 1995–2024
The ten systems with the most service difficulty reports, by FAA system code (JASC). Fewer than 200 reports were filed on the Cutlass RG in 2016–2025, so read these as long-run patterns.
32Landing Gear Actuator8321%1
Parts most often named Actuator (63) · Housing (11) · Bushing (2) · Piston (2)
(CAN) PILOT REPORTED THAT HE HAD NO GREEN GEAR DOWN AND LOCKED LIGHT INDICATION. HE COULD SEE THAT THE MAIN GEAR WAS DOWN, AND HE FLEW BY THE TOWER TO GET A VISUAL REPORT FROM THE CONTROLLER. THEY REPORTED THAT THE GEAR APPEARED TO BE DOWN. UPON LANDING AFTER TOUCHDOWN, THE NOSE GEAR COLLAPSED AND THE AIRCRAFT SETTLED ON ITS NOSE DAMAGING THE PROPELLER AND NOSE GEAR DOORS. UPON INSPECTION IT WAS FOUND THAT THE NOSE GEAR ACTUATOR HAD BROKEN AT THE BASE OF THE THREADED AREA. (TC# 20190610008)
DURING SCHECULED INSPECTION. LT MAIN GEAR ACTUATOR BODY WAS FOUND TO BE CRACKED NEAR FORWARD ATTACH BOLT HOLE. ACTUATOR BODY REMOVED AND CRACK WAS VERIFIED BY METHOD OF DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION. ACTUATOR BODY HAD A DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED 283.3 HRS PRIOR, WITH NO ANOMALIES NOTED.
DURING SCHECULED INSPECTION. RT MAIN GEAR ACTUATOR BODY FOUND TO BE CRACKED NEAR FORWARD ATTACH BOLT HOLE. ACTUATOR BODY WAS REMOVED AND CRACK VERIFIED BY DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION. ACTUATOR BODY HAD A DYE PENETRANT INSPECTION PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED 98.3 HRS PRIOR, WITH NO ANOMALIES NOTED.
53Fuselage Main, Bulkhead5013%0
Parts most often named Bulkhead (49) · Doubler (1)
(CAN) PARTS WERE CRACKED AT ATTACH POINTS OF WHEEL WELL COVER SKIN 2412011-1 AND BULKHEADS STATION 108 AND 124 AND CRACK ON WHEEL WELL COVER AT RT FRONT CORNER WHERE IT ATTACHES TO BULKHEAD STATION 108. TIEDOWN RINGS ALSO ATTACH IN THIS AREA. (TC NR 20070502005)
CRACKS WERE LOCATED AT LT AND RT RELIEF CUTS OF STATION 124.00 UPPER FUSELAGE BULKHEAD. PROBABLE CAUSE FOR LT SIDE IS AUX POWER RECEPTACLE AND RT SIDE COULD BE FROM LANDING STRESSES.
CRACKS IN LOWER LEFT BULKHEAD UNDER PILOT'S INBOARD RUDDER PEDAL TORQUE TUBE PILLOW BLOCK, ALLOWED ABNORMAL FORWARD/AFT MOVEMENT OF RUDDER PEDAL TORQUE TUBE. REPORTED TO MFG BY TELECON. (AL03200407996)
32Landing Gear Retract/Extend System287.1%1
Parts most often named Pivot (7) · Pivot Assy (4) · Fitting (3) · Sector Gear (2)
(CAN) GEAR DID NOT GO DOWN ALL THE WAY WHEN PILOT SELECTED GEAR DOWN. PILOT USED HAND PUMP TO EXTEND LANDING GEAR THE REST OF WAY DOWN, GEAR LOCKED DOWN AND MADE NORMAL LANDING. ACFT WAS PUT ON JACKS AND FOUND THAT THE GEAR OPERATED INTERMITTENTLY, CAUSE OF THE INTERMITTENT OPS WAS FOUND TO BE AN INTERMITTENT RELAY, S1577A1 WHICH IS MOUNTED ON THE FIREWALL IN THE CABIN. RELAY WAS REPLACED AND GEAR OPERATED NORMALLY.
WHILE REPLACING A BROKEN GEAR ACTUATOR THE PIVOT WAS REMOVED AND INSPECTED. A CRACK WAS FOUND IN THE LOWER RADIUS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE GEAR SPLINES. TO PREVENT THIS PROBLEM IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE MLG PIVOTS BE REMOVED FROM THE AIRCRAFT AND INSPECTED EVERY 1000 HOURS. IT IS ALSO SUGGESTED THAT THE MFG OF THIS PART REDESIGN THE PART OUT OF STEEL.
DURING 100 HR INSPECTION, FOUND BOTH LT AND RT MLG PIVOT BUSHINGS SPLIT AND LEAKING GREASE. THESE BUSHINGS ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED IAW AD2001-06-06, SB 90-1, SK 172-151. THE SRM HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED TO SHOW ANY DETAIL OF THIS STYLE BUSHING. NO INSPECTION PROCEDURES FOR THIS STYLE BUSHING. PARTS MANUAL ALSO HAS NOT BEE UPDATED. MUCH CONFUSION ABOUNDS CONCERNING THESE BUSHINGS. (NM09200412026)
32Main Landing Gear Attach Section256.4%0
Parts most often named Pivot (15) · Pivot Assy (6) · Fitting (3) · Bushing (1)
FOUND CRACK IN RIGHT MAIN GEAR PIVOT ASSEMBLY AT CASTING SEAM. AIRPLANE SAT FOR 8 YEARS ON THE COAST OF FLORIDA. CORROSION WAS A MAJOR FACTOR IN THIS CRACK. PLANE WAS REPAINTED AND CRACK WAS COVERED. PAINT WAS SPLITTING IN AREA. STRIPPED PAINT AND THE CRACK APPEARED. IT WAS CRACKED ALL THE WAY THROUGH HOUSING DOWN TO GEAR LEG AND EXTENDED IN TOWARDS PIVOT 4 INCHES.
FITTING CRACKED ON IB SIDE. DISCOVERED ON 100 HOUR INSPECTION. NO RECOMMENDATION, EXCEPT, CLOSE INSPECTION, ONE TIME INSPECTION ANNUALLY.
(CAN) INSTALLATION OF UNAPPROVED PARTS AS DEFINED BY APPENDIX D - REPORTING UNAPPROVED PARTS USING THE SDR SYSTEM. PARAGRAPH (2)(C). LANDING GEAR PIVOTS DISCOVERED WHICH HAD MATERIAL REMOVED IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE ISSUES RAISED BY AD 2000-06-06 C IN CONTRAVENTION OF CESSNA APPROVED PRACTICES.
85Reciprocating Engine Cylinder Section133.3%1
Parts most often named Cylinder (4) · Piston Ring (2) · Cylinder Head (2) · Retainer (1)
BOLTS USED FOR THE NUMBER TWO CONNECTING ROD AND END CAP. ONE OF THE BOLTS SHOWED SIGNS OF A 45 DEGREE FRACTURE AND SIGNS OF BEING STRETCHED AND BENDING CAUSING THE BOLT TO BREAK. THE END CAP ALSO SHOWED SIGNS OF BEING DEFORMED FROM ONE OF THE TWO BOLTS FAILING CAUSING THE REMAINING BOLT TO CARRY THE LOAD OF TWO. THE OTHER BOLT HAD FRACTURED AT THE LOWER THREADED AREA WITH SIGNS OF STRESS FATIGUE AND IS BELIEVED TO BE THE FIRST BOLT TO FAIL. THIS APPEARS TO BE THE REASON FOR THE NUMBER TWO CONNECTING ROD FAILURE.
ON JULY 8, 2008, MADE AN EMERGENCY LANDING IN DESSERT TERRAIN AFTER THE ENGINE BEGAN TO EXHIBIT SEVERE VIBRATIONS, LOSS OF POWER AND SMOKE. THE NR 2 CYLINDER WAS FOUND TO HAVE SEPARATED FROM THE CASE, SEVEN OF THE EIGHT HOLD STUDS WERE FOUND TO HAVE SHEARED. ONLY ONE HOLD DOWN STUD WAS LT INTACT. THERE WAS NO HISTORY IN THE AC LOGS TO INDICATE IF THE HOLD DOWN STUDS HAD BEEN REPLACED. (K)
(CAN) AIRCRAFT WAS IN A CRUISE CONFIGURATION WHEN THE PILOT NOTICED A VIBRATION FROM THE ENGINE. REDUCED POWER AND CAME BACK TO LAND AT THE DEPARTING AIRPORT WITHOUT INCIDENT. AIRCRAFT WAS BROUGHT INTO THE HANGER AND THE COWLINGS WERE REMOVED. IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE NR 2 CYLINDER HAD CRACKED FROM THE UPPER SPARK PLUG HOLE TO THE LOWER SPARK PLUG HOLE. NEW CYLINDER WAS ORDERED FROM MFG.
29Hydraulic System, Main133.3%2
Parts most often named Pivot (3) · Powerpack (3) · Hydraulic Line (2) · Pipe (2)
NOSE GEAR UP HOSE P/N S2178-4-0105 PULLED OUT OF ITS CRIMPED FERRULE ON LANDING GEAR UP CYCLE DURING FLIGHT. ALL HYDRAULIC FLUID LOST FROM HYDRAULIC POWER PACK. EMERGENCY GEAR DOWN SYSTEM WAS INOPERABLE DUE TO NO HYDRAULIC FLUID.
HOSE ASSY FROM GEAR MOTOR TO NOSE GEAR ACTUATOR FAILED AT THE HOSE FITTING. REPLACES ASSY WITH BRAIDED STAINLESS STEEL HOSE. GEAR SWINGS CHECKED GOOD. NO LEAKS. MANUAL GEAR EXTENSION SYS FUNCTION CHECKED GOOD. ACFT TEST FLOWN, CHECKED GOOD. LANDING GEAR CYCLED SEVERAL TIMES UP/DOWN DURING FLIGHT. FUNCTIONED GOOD.
INSTALLED A NEWLY OVERHAULED COMPLETE HYDRAULIC POWER PACK UNIT AS RECEIVED. AFTER INSTALLING THE UNIT IN THE AIRCRAFT AND PERFORMING A RETRACT TEST THE NEW OVERHAULED GEAR MOTOR WAS JERKY AND ACTING LIKE IT WAS SHORTING OUT. REMOVED MOTOR AND INSTALLED ANOTHER NEW OVERHAULED MOTOR AND SYSTEM WORKED FINE. (K)
27Rudder Control System92.3%0
Parts most often named Torque Tube (6) · Rudder Pedal (2) · Rudder Bar (1)
PILOT''S LEFT RUDDER PEDAL REPORTED AS ''NOT WORKING''. FOUND RUDDER PEDAL SUPPPORT POST BROKEN OFF RUDDER PEDAL TORQUE TUBE. MAINTENANCE REMOVED AND REPLACED ENTIRE TORQUE TUBE ASSEMBLY, LINKAGES, BEARING BLOCKS, AND HARDWARE (BOTH SIDES). (X)
THE LT FOOT AND BRAKE PEDAL WELD ASSY FAILED DURING ROUTINE LOCAL FLIGHT. INSP OF RUDDER BAR REVEALED A BROKEN PILOT SIDE LT RUDDER PEDAL ATTACH TUBE AT WELD LINE. THE TUBE BROKE COMPLETELY AWAY FROM RUDDER BAR AT THE WELD. POSSIBLE CAUSE MAY BE METAL FATIGUE ON RUDDER BAR DUE TO STRESS APPLIED ON WELD THROUGH NORMAL RUDDER PEDAL OPERATION OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. SUBMITTER SUGGESTED INSPECTION CRITERIA BE OUTLINED TO PREVENT FAILURE OF PART.
PILOT REPORTED LOSS OF RUDDER CONTROL IN-FLIGHT ALTHOUGH HE WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE AIRCRAFT AND MADE AN UNEVENTFUL LANDING. FOUND THE AFT (RIGHT HAND) RUDDER PEDAL TORQUE TUBE WAS BROKEN APPROXIMATELY 7/8 OF THE WAY AROUND THE TUBE JUST TO THE LEFT SIDE OF THE SECTOR GEAR. THIS ALLOWED THE TWO SECTOR GEARS TO DISENGAGE WHICH UNSYNCHRONIZED THE TWO TORQUE TUBES. BECAUSE OF THIS, THE RUDDER CABLE TENSION WAS UNABLE TO BE MAINTAINED.
32Main Landing Gear Strut/Axle/Truck92.3%0
Parts most often named Axle (2) · Bearing (2) · Fitting (2) · Pivot (1)
AIRCRAFT WOULD NOT STEER ON TAKEOFF ROLL. BRAKES INEFFECTIVE TO TURN. DISASSEMBLED NOSE GEAR TRUNNION AND FOUND UPPER AND LOWER NACELLE BEARINGS RUSTED AND FROZEN. NO PROVISIONS FOR LUBRICATION AT THESE POINTS. AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURED 1982.
AIRCRAFT WOULD NOT STEER ON TAKEOFF ROLL. BRAKES INEFFECTIVE TO TURN. DISASSEMBLED NOSE GEAR TRUNNION AND FOUND UPPER ANDFROZEN. NO PROVISIONS FOR LUBRICATION AT THESE POINTS. AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURED 1982.
DURING INSTRUCTIONAL FLIGHT INVOLVING TAKEOFF AND LANDINGS, THE PILOT WAS INFORMED VIA RADIO FROM ANOTHER AIRCRAFT THAT THE ACFT NOSE WHEEL HAD FALLEN OFF. HE PROCEEDED TO SEE WHERE HE MADE A SUCCESSFUL EMERGENCY LANDING. INSPECTION OF THE ACFT NLG ASSY INDICATED THE NLG AXLE BOLT, AN 5-47, HAD FAILED. NOTE: THE REMAINS OF THIS BOLT WERE STILL IN THE RT HAND SIDE OF THE NLG FORK ASSY. CLOSER INSPECTION OF THIS BOLT INDICATED IT HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY FRACTURED/CRACKED. TOTAL TIME ON THIS BOLT IS UNKNOWN.
61Propeller Blade Section71.8%0
Parts most often named Blade (4) · Bearing (2) · Snap Ring (1)
(CAN) PROPELLER RECEIVED FOR TBO OVERHAUL. UPON DISMANTLE INSPECTION, THE BLADE THRUST BEARINGS WERE FOUND CORRODED. THE BEARINGS WERE REPLACED WITH NEW BEARINGS.
PILOT NOTICED SCRATCHES ON PROPELLER DURING POST-FLIGHT INSPECTION FOLLOWING COMPLETION OF A BREAK-IN FLIGHT FOR NEWLY OVERHAULED ENGINE AND PROPELLER. INSPECTION FOUND SPINNER AND SPINNER BULKHEAD DAMAGED AND REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. PROP TT: 1,887.8 HOURS. PROP TSO: 2.2 HOURS.
PROPELLER WAS NOT CYCLING PROPERLY. REMOVED TO BENCH TEST. BLADES WERE BINDING WHEN TESTED. DISASSEMBLED AND FOUND BLADE BEARINGS DRY AND BROKEN, BALL BEARINGS PITTED, AND PITCH CHANGE LINKS AND ACTUATING PINS WORN BADLY. SUBMITTER STATED PROP MAY NOT HAVE BEEN LUBRICATED PROPERLY AT ASSEMBLY. THE PROPELLER SHOULD HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND REPAIRED WHEN PROBLEMS WITH CYCLING FIRST STARTED.
73Fuel Control/Reciprocating Engines61.5%0
Parts most often named Carburetor (2) · Float (2) · Carburetor Valve (1) · Valve Tang (1)
PILOTS REPORT EXCESS MAGNETO DROPS OF GREATER THAN 300 RPM'S AND SEVERE ENGINE ROUGHNESS. THE FLOAT IN THE CARBURETOR WAS REMOVED AND FOUND THAT THE REAR-MOST CHAMBER WAS FILLED WITH FUEL. FLOAT IS A PLASTIC DESIGN WITH 3 VISABLE CHAMBERS. THE CHAMBER THAT WAS FULL OF FUEL WAS THE ONE CLOSEST TO THE NEEDLE VALVE. UPON INSTALLING A [S/N removed] FLOAT, ENGINE OPERATED NORMALLY.
PILOT REPORTED ENGINE QUIT ON FINAL APPROACH OVER RUNWAY. DELIVERED TO MAINTEANCE, UNABLE TO GET GOOD RUN-UP. DISCOVERED CARBURETOR FLOAT FULL OF FUEL. REPLACED WITH [S/N removed] FLOAT. ENGINE OPS CHECK GOOD.
FULL THROTTLE STOP WORN CAUSING A LEAN MIXTURE. WHEN THE PART IS FULL RICH WITH THE SCREW TYPE MIX CONTROL, PRESSURE IS PUT ON THE FULL RICH STOP. STOP IS BEHIND A COVER PLATE WHICH HAMPERS VISABILITY. WEAR CAUSES THE METER HOLE ON MIXTURE TO OVER-CENTER CAUSING A MORE LEAN MIXTURE.
Open a row to read what mechanics wrote. Tail and serial numbers are removed.
At the pre-buy
My pre-buy card · Cutlass RG
0 of 7 looked at
The components written up most often since 2011. Take this to the pre-buy and ask your inspector about each one; tap a mark to record what they found. Saved on this device only.
- Landing Gear Actuator
- Hydraulic System, Main
- Horizontal Stabilizer, Spar/Rib
- Landing Gear Retract/Extend System
- Magneto/Distributor
- Rudder Structure
- Fuselage Main, Attach Fittings
A starting point for the conversation with your inspector, not maintenance advice.
What buyers get caught by
The expensive surprises on any used airplane are missing logbooks, corrosion under paint, outstanding ADs, an engine near overhaul, and the same squawk written up again and again. The card lists where the Cutlass RG gets written up; the AD timetable below lists what the FAA requires.
Ask for the logbook entries that match each item. A repeated entry is a pattern, not a coincidence.
Alerts for the Cutlass RG
An email when a new airworthiness directive names the Cutlass RG, or when reports on it spike. Alerts are starting soon: leave your email and we’ll send a confirmation link before anything else. Unsubscribe anytime.
We store only your email and which pages you follow. We never share it.